<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Religion is Bullshit !</title><description/><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/index.php</link><managingEditor>Ben</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>78</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-7614940502981168969</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-10T01:20:15.832Z</atom:updated><title>Announcement</title><atom:summary type='text'>The server this site is on has just had its php upgraded.  This has had the interesting effect of stopping everything from working properly.  I'm currently trying to get it all sorted and, hopefully, have a bit of a tidy up around here.  In the meantime, feel free to look around - there is actually some good stuff hidden in this mess of a website.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2008/03/announcement.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-6401833669625975132</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-13T19:39:48.767Z</atom:updated><title>Bashing the bishop</title><atom:summary type='text'>It would have been nice if all the people who have been foaming at the mouth following the recent comments by the Archbishop of Canterbury on Sharia law recently had have found out what he actually said first.

He's still wrong thought, for the reasons highlighted in this post by the Pub Philosopher.  I don't always agree with Pub, but here he points out exactly why religious groups should never </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2008/02/bashing-bishop.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-268663274745179009</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-04T20:33:37.774Z</atom:updated><title>Evolution in Five minutes</title><atom:summary type='text'>I couldn't ignore the invitation to share this video.There are two things that creationists just don't seem to grasp about evolution - firstly that any changes were gradual (I have actually been called stupid for apparently believing that one day a monkey gave birth to a human) and secondly the fact that these changes happened over hundreds of millions of years (admittedly the timescale involved </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2008/02/evolution-in-five-minutes.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-5942894681051745274</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-10T00:28:04.334Z</atom:updated><title>Some good news</title><atom:summary type='text'>It seems that the UK's "ancient, discriminatory, unnecessary, illiberal and non-human rights compliant" blasphemy laws - which are generally ignored anyway - are likely to be abolished [BBC News story].

Although certain religious groups will be seriously pissed off by this, it seems that many high profile Christians are in favour of the law being abolished.  Lib Dem MP Evan Harris points out the</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2008/01/some-good-news.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-4164145375509742338</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-26T11:50:12.060Z</atom:updated><title>Hello again</title><atom:summary type='text'>... it's been a while.  Thought I'd give the place a new coat of paint before adding any new content.

I doubt that this blog will be updated very often - it's just too frustrating to write.  There are only a certain number of times you can point out the flaws in Pascal's wager, or point out that evolution is not about things "all growed by random" - before going completely insane, and keeping up</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/12/hello-again.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-7551991520555760982</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-21T05:46:37.701Z</atom:updated><title>Thoughts from JGJ</title><atom:summary type='text'>Hey everyone, this is JGJ, but you can call me Jim if you like. I decided to make a post after a long hiatus. Hey! I actually had time to devote to one as I wait for the new carpet in my house.

So, anyway, here it goes.

I am a relativist. I am a classical liberal who believes that people are entitled to their own beliefs, especially when it comes to belief in a god or not. You may be wondering </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/08/hey-everyone-this-is-jgj-but-you-can.php</link><author>JGJ</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-8853561655069664174</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-03T20:51:57.643Z</atom:updated><title>Popping my tag cherry</title><atom:summary type='text'>Criminy, I've never been tagged before. Scandalous, I know. The rules:

1. We have to post these rules before we give you the facts.
2. Players start with eight random facts/habits about themselves.
3. People who are tagged need to write their own blog about their eight things and post these rules.
4. At the end of your blog post, you need to choose eight people to get tagged and list their names</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/07/popping-my-tag-cherry.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-6067506745614701804</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-06-26T17:52:58.076Z</atom:updated><title>Items worthy of your attention</title><atom:summary type='text'>This, regarding the dubious nature of the kerfuffle over the Slightly Disturbing Ring Thing, and this, which has a lovely picture of Rage Boy (who, it must be said, gives good rage) and a smashing quote from Butterflies and Wheels which deserves reprinting in full:

'...along with not giving them an inch it’s crucial that we keep explaining to them and to the fans of inch-giving why we are not </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/06/items-worthy-of-your-attention.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-404829575298407960</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-06-18T18:56:44.718Z</atom:updated><title>Silence explained</title><atom:summary type='text'>You know why I don't post very often any more? It's not just the state of constant boiling rage at the muppetry on display at Comment Is Free, oh no. It's that writing takedowns of the insanity, undeserved respect and appalling reasoning that are the defining characteristics of any of the constant stream of religious farces that scroll across our screens and pages day in day out has become so </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/06/silence-explained.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-8190749057860008653</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-05-19T11:37:35.465Z</atom:updated><title>Anonymous Atheist Complaint Box</title><atom:summary type='text'>Teh funny.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/05/anonymous-atheist-complaint-box.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-7871415110810903167</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-05-16T17:57:27.040Z</atom:updated><title>In Memory of Falwell</title><atom:summary type='text'>via Pharyngula.

</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/05/in-memory-of-falwell.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-6307055606946780360</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-05-07T18:49:44.983Z</atom:updated><title>Proof?</title><atom:summary type='text'>In the midst of an article that can never quite bring itself to discuss whether the arguments of the 'New Atheists' are actually valid or not, Bunters says something amusing.

Yet The God Delusion is not a book of persuasion, but of provocation - it may have sold in the thousands but has it won any souls? Anyone who has experienced such a conversion, please email me (with proof).

Any ideas on </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/05/proof.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-1184247089932582612</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-04-06T19:36:31.817Z</atom:updated><title>Matthew Parris cured my eczema</title><atom:summary type='text'>It really is a great op-ed, so much so that I'll quote the same exact same bit as MediawatchWatch:

 You are living, dear reader, at a watershed in human history. This is the  century during which, after 2,000 years of what has been a pretty bloody  marriage, faith and reason must agree to part, citing irreconcilable  differences. So block your ears to the cooing voices on Thought for the  Day, </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/04/matthew-parris-cured-my-eczema.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-6612643810047475949</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-23T17:40:09.745Z</atom:updated><title>John Paul II gave me eczema</title><atom:summary type='text'>So there's this nun, right, who claims that JP2 cured her of Parkinson's disease (someone might want to let Michael J Fox and Muhammad Ali know). I'm not entirely sure why he gets the credit - certainly this article doesn't actually mention him appearing before the nun in a vision, or speaking to her from the plughole like that clown in It, or whatever the hell it is recently deceased pontiffs do</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/04/john-paul-ii-gave-me-eczema.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-2319283673237386961</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-04-03T19:02:56.412Z</atom:updated><title>Isn't faith wonderful?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Thousand of Aids and HIV patients are risking their lives by refusing medication in favour of holy water. (via RDF)

Well that's just marvellous, isn't it? With the vitamin pill lot at one end and the church the other, they've just about got the AIDS sufferers covered. Probably serves 'em right, it's a bummer's disease after all, innit? Let the following lines wash over you much like holy water </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/04/isnt-faith-wonderful.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-8211964445150344347</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-08T20:01:27.952Z</atom:updated><title>The Secular Islam Summit</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is excellent, and deserves much attention. Via B&amp;W.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/03/secular-islam-summit.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-8671492760268485314</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-04T14:08:35.188Z</atom:updated><title>To take on another McGrath comment</title><atom:summary type='text'>A point from Alister McGrath:

"Dawkins often compares belief in God to an infantile belief in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy, saying it is something we should all outgrow. But the analogy is flawed. How many people do you know who started to believe in Santa Claus in adulthood?"

A counterpoint from me:

Very few (thank fuck). But the point is unexpectedly interesting, because yes, fair enough, </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/03/to-take-on-another-mcgrath-comment.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-6839601701020326054</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T22:16:07.835Z</atom:updated><title>Bishop bashing</title><atom:summary type='text'>If you're a UK resident, you might want to consider writing to your MP in support of this. That's me on the comments at RDF, advising personal letters cos the pro formas are apparently often binned. Get to it.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/02/bishop-bashing.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-4918159388487844788</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T21:34:13.655Z</atom:updated><title>Now that's an academic</title><atom:summary type='text'>Via MediaWatchWatch, a lecturer at Cambridge weighs into the Clare College row in splendid fashion:

"[I] regard the satirizing of religion as commendable, indeed in the present atmosphere I think it is practically obligatory."

Good work fella.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/02/now-thats-academic.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-253055230848817186</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-26T21:45:21.345Z</atom:updated><title>In which I despairingly turn to the Oscars for comfort</title><atom:summary type='text'>It never ends, does it?

For the sake of form, let's skip through some of the dafter stuff:

"Atheists like the Richard Dawkins of this world are just as fundamentalist as the people setting off bombs on the tube": presumably Colin Dee doesn't actually intend to directly equate a scientist writing a book about an evidence-free mass delusion with savage loons blowing up commuters, but it's a nice </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/02/in-which-i-despairingly-turn-to-oscars.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-117136212363954247</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-13T10:22:03.656Z</atom:updated><title>Clare College Roundup</title><atom:summary type='text'>Forgive the lazy link dump, but I struggle these days to write much more than "aaarrrrghhnnng" about cases like this.

MediawatchWatch: Toon rage in Cambridge; NSS sticks up for Clareification Editor.
National Secular Society (via the above): College Principals Should Stand up for Free Speech...
Butterflies and Wheels: Pub Philosopher on Clare College; Some of the most senior staff are utterly </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/02/clare-college-roundup.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-116838359868970830</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-09T22:59:58.716Z</atom:updated><title>Tradition and belief</title><atom:summary type='text'>I apologise in advance for the fact that this is highly likely to turn into a semi-drunken rambling rant on what is really a social issue (apologies also to Steve - no disrespect to his wife intended).  I should point out that this post is about Christianity in England - things are obviously very different elsewhere.

From the Pub Philosopher -
Having a history degree, she [his wife] also knows </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2007/01/tradition-and-belief.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-116535324187986008</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-05T21:14:01.933Z</atom:updated><title>How to win an argument</title><atom:summary type='text'>If your annoyance levees are feeling solid and secure, then take a stroll over here and witness Sam Harris endure the email equivalent of closing his eyes and running at a wall. If you've debated religious bods of any stripe for any amount of time, you'll recognise plenty of the usual arguments from Prager, stuff that many of the fundie clots that roll up here have deployed in the past.

Is it </atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2006/12/how-to-win-argument.php</link><author>Ben</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-116275454259516852</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-05T19:22:22.606Z</atom:updated><title>Bigoted hypocrite</title><atom:summary type='text'>&lt;smug mode&gt;
Disgraced former US evangelist leader Reverend Ted Haggard has confessed to his followers that he was guilty of "sexual immorality". [BBC News story]
&lt;/smug mode&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2006/11/bigoted-hypocrite.php</link><author>Tim</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15841225.post-116103850488367225</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-16T22:41:44.893Z</atom:updated><title>The Brick Testament</title><atom:summary type='text'>Lego-based religion is something I might just be able to get behind.</atom:summary><link>http://www.religionisbullshit.net/blog/2006/10/brick-testament.php</link><author>Ben</author></item></channel></rss>